The rhino is certainly one of the most endangered large mammals in Southern Africa and it is definitely threatened with extinction and yet the very people who should be saving it i.e. CITES and our nature conservation authorities are helping instead to push it to extinction.

The Rhino (uniquely amongst our large animals) grows its horn again if it is cut off, in other words you can cut it off with no ill effects to the Rhino and in two or three years time you can cut it off again. The Rhino lives for up to 40 years so why would you want to kill it at any stage during that 40 years but most Rhino in this country are killed long before they even reach the half way mark.

It is a fact that anyone who wants a permit to take a Rhino horn out of this country must kill the Rhino first. The only exception is if you export the live rhino with its horn intact. Either way this country loses a rhino which we can simply not afford as it is one of our most valuable natural resources. It has now been proven that when nature conservation stopped issuing permits to Vietnamese, poaching rocketed. Yet we have so much horn in state coffers and being carried on live rhinos in the private sector all of which could be used to reduce poaching without harm to the rhino!

It is a fact that the majority of rhino hunters in this country are pseudo hunters and they do not want to kill the animal, they only want the horn. But our regulations (national and international) force them to kill the animal to get a permit to export the horn.

The government and CITES could dramatically immediately reduce the poaching by legalizing the trade in the Rhino horn.

It is time we did something to stop this atrocious slaughter…we need your voice!

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Letter published in the Star - March 2011

The following is a letter by Michael Eustace which was printed in the Star on 19 March 2011 :

John Sellar from Cites (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) was reported in the Saturday Star as suggesting that the answer to rhino poaching was that “we try to convince them (Far Eastern people) that rhino horn doesn’t work”.

The Chinese, who are the main market, have been using rhino horn as a medicine for centuries and to hope to change their customs now is probably futile.

On trade Sellar says that “the only people you can sell horn to are criminals and of course there is no way Cites will authorise that”.  The reality is that Cites banned international trade in horn 35 years ago and by so doing ensured that all the trade has been exclusively for criminals ever since.   There were said to have been 60,000 rhino in Africa in 1970.  Given their natural growth rate, that number should have grown to 600,000 today.  But we only have 25,000 or 4% of what we should have had.      That is the Cites scorecard.  

About 500 rhino were killed in Africa last year for their horns.  Africa could provide 500 horns from natural deaths alone, without having to kill one rhino.  The solution is to have a regulated trade in horn not a ban on trade.  For Cites to persist with their failed strategy, and hope for a different outcome, is senseless. 

Thursday, July 21, 2011

An interesting series of analogies in a letter to The Star Newspaper by Dr David Walker, an Ecologist from White River, Mpumalanga.

Legalise rhino horn to save the species
The Star : July 11 2011 at 09:00am

Imagine if, deep in the bushveld, we discover that one of our rare tree species produces a fruit that is highly prized by foreigners, and that these foreigners are willing to pay untold sums of money to gain that fruit.
Of course, there is something of a gold-rush as the poorer members of the community strip the trees of their fruit to sell to foreign traders, and the population of the trees begins to decline.
Imagine if, instead of allowing farmers to cultivate the tree to bring in much-needed income (and of course save the tree species), the government steps in and bans the sale of the fruit and supports other countries trying to find a substitute for our fruit product.
Economic madness? Would a government be that stupid? Well, of course, as the tree numbers continue to decline, desperate and unscrupulous people continue to raid its fruit and, as it becomes rarer, it becomes more expensive.
Sadly, we have a real example of this in South Africa, and that is rhino horn. Would we ban mohair if a few angora goats were poached in the Eastern Cape? Would Western Cape vineyard owners actively campaign for other countries to find substitutes for our home-grown wine?
Then why on Earth do we do the same in the case of rhino horn? Our present policy is clearly not working. Rhino are being killed at an ever-increasing rate, and the rarer they become, the more valuable they become. Economic models have shown that it makes economic sense (from the viewpoint of poachers, that is) to hunt a species to extinction.
The way to save the rhino is to make it economically rewarding to produce and protect them.
This can only be done by legalising and regulating trade in rhino horn.
Removing the horn does not need to harm the rhino any more than shearing a sheep.
The income generated from the sales can be pumped back into rhino conservation.
Who cares if the Chinese think it’s an aphrodisiac? I have found chocolate to be far more successful, but hey – whatever blows your hair back (and no one is saying we should ban chocolate).
I don’t understand why some foreigners buy large amounts of South African ostrich feathers – I don’t think they suit most chaps – but I am glad they do, as it brings in much-needed foreign revenue.
Should we ban ostrich feathers?
Would the Arabs ban oil?
Here we have a highly valuable, unique product, and our response is to ban it!
Allow game farmers to sell rhino horn under carefully regulated conditions.
It would bring in foreign revenue and encourage farmers to “grow” and protect rhino.
They would swamp the market, bring down the price, make poaching not worth it and most importantly, save the rhino.
Our present policies are not working and these species are on the brink.
Dr David Walker
Ecologist
White River, Mpumalanga

Monday, July 18, 2011

DEBATE ON AFRICA GEOGRAPHIC'S FACEBOOK


Dear Rhino Friends,

There has been some healthy debate on Africa Geographic’s Facebook. I will gladly respond to any criticism or questions. Any help to further my cause to increase the number of rhino and to combat the dramatic poaching and legal hunting will be greatly appreciated. 

The link to it, with my comments, is :



“Did you know these rhino facts?”

  • • Rhino are endangered and nearing extinction due to relentless hunting and poaching
  • • Rhino populations have declined by 90 percent since 1970
  • • Rhino are classified in 5 species all of which are endangered. We have two species in Africa – the Black rhino and White rhino
  • • Rhino horn is not a true horn and is made of thickly matted hair
  • • Rhino horn can be removed from the rhino with no ill effect to the animal if done professionally
  • • Rhino horn regrows to a substantial length with in four years
  • • Rhino horn can only be exported as a hunting (killed rhino) trophy
  • • Rhino horn stock piles exist that could be sold to support conservation